I'm not going to pretend that I know much about Minimal music, but listening to last week's chamber concerts did make me curious to learn more. I've found some background info about the pieces performed and thought I would share them on today's post.
First in the program was 1+1 (1967) by Philip Glass. This was the amplified table top I wrote about last week. David Robertson theorized that Glass wrote this while working as a cab driver, sitting in line at JFK airport. Notes on Glass' website say that "The player performs 1+1 by tapping the table top with his fingers or knuckles. Two rhythmic units which build the block of 1+1 are combined in regular arithmetic progressions." David Robertson positioned himself in front of the amplified table (which was hooked to a contact microphone) and played the piece with his finger tips. He said he tried using his knuckles earlier, but they became pretty sore from all that table knocking.
I think an article from the Washington Post highlights a nice way to approach Glass: "Much of his mature work is based on the extended repetition of brief, elegant melodic fragments that weave in and out of an aural tapestry. Listening to these works has been compared to watching a challenging modern painting that initially appears static but seems to metamorphose slowly as one concentrates."
The second piece performed was Glass' Music in Similar Motion (1969). Here's a quote from Glass about this piece, taken from his website: "The real innovation in Similar Motion is its sense of drama. The earlier pieces were meditative steady-state pieces that established a mood and stayed there. But Similar Motion starts with one voice, then adds another playing a fourth above the original line, and finally a last line kicks in to complete the sound. As each new voice enters, there is a dramatic change in the music".
The final piece of the program was Terry Riley's In C, which was my favorite of the night. Its considered to be the first significant piece of Minimal music. Check out how complicated this must be for the musicians (I found this on Wikipedia): "In C consists of 53 short, numbered musical phrases; each phrase may be repeated an arbitrary number of times. Each musician has control over which phrase he or she plays: players are encouraged to play the phrases starting at different times, even if they are playing the same phrase. The performance directions state that the musical ensemble should try to stay within two to three phrases of each other. The phrases must be played in order, although some may be skipped. As detailed in some editions of the score, it is customary for one musician ("traditionally played by a beautiful girl", Riley notes) to play the note C (in octaves) in repeated eighth notes. This drone functions as a metronome and is referred to as "the Pulse"."
As David Robertson took his seat, he jokingly commented that instead of a "beautiful girl" playing the pulse, we were stuck with him. He also noted that this part was suggested by Steve Reich. Riley felt like the piece was missing something, and Reich said what it really needed was a pulse. Reich also appeared in the first performance of In C. I enjoyed hearing this anecdote which tied in this concert with a composer we featured in a concert last year, during Brancusi and Serra in Dialogue.
If you are curious to read more...here's an excellent review of the concerts in the weekend's Post-Dispatch. (Rachel)